Principles of the 3Rs and ARRIVE Guidelines in Animal Research

  • Salva Reverentia Yurista Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands
  • Rafi Andika Ferdian University of San Fransisco, California, USA
  • Djanggan Sargowo Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University–Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia

Abstract

The use of animals in research has concerned the general public and thoughtful researchers for a long time. For improved animal welfare and increased research quality, researchers have moral obligations to include the 3Rs. The Three Rs are basic principles of humane experimental technique that were first set out by Russell and Burch in 1959. They are now widely accepted within the international scientific community and in associated legislation and guidelines, as a means of avoiding or reducing animal use and suffering and helping to improve the quality of science. When reporting animal studies, it is recommended that manuscripts conform to the principals of the Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, incorporated the 3Rs principal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Van der Worp HB, Howells DW, Sena ES, et al. Can animal
models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med.
2010;7(3):e1000245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000245.

2. Macleod MR, Fisher M, O’Collins V, et al. Good laboratory
practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Stroke.
2009;40(3):50–52.

3. Sherwin CM. Animal welfare: reporting details is good science.
Nature. 2007;448:251.

4. Jafari P, Azuaje F. An assessment of recently published gene expression
analyses: reporting experimental design and stattistics.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:27

5. Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, et al. Where is the evidence that
animal research benefits humans? BMJ. 2004;328:514–517.

6. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and
reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86–89.

7. Wurbel H. Publications should include an animal welfare section.
Nature. 2007;446:257.

8. Macleod MR, Collins T, Howells DW, Donnan GA. Pooling of
animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and
publication bias. Stroke. 2004;35:1203–8.

9. Mignini LE, Khan KS. Methodological quality of systematic
reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:10.

10. Törnqvist E, Annas A, Granath B, et al. Strategic focus on 3R
principles reveals major reductions in the use of animals in pharmaceutical
toxicity testing. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e101638.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101638.

11. Ohno Y. ICH Guidelines—implementation of the 3Rs (refinement,
reduction, and replacement): incorporating best scientific
practices into the regulatory process. Institute for Laboratory
Animal Research J. 2002;43(Suppl 1):S95–S98.

12. Flecknell P. Replacement, reduction and refinement. Altex.
2002;19:73–78.

13. Schuppli CA, Fraser D. The interpretation and application of
the three Rs by animal ethics committee members. Altern Lab
Anim. 2005;33:487–500.

14. Mellor DJ. Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” by updating
the “Five Provisions” and introducing aligned “Animal Welfare
Aims”. Animals. 2016;6,59. doi: 10.3390/ani6100059.

15. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, et al. Animal research:
reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. PLoS
Biol. 2010;8,e1000412.

16. Cressey D. Surge in support for animal-research guidelines:
journals throw their weight behind checklist for rigorous animal
experiments. Nature. 2016. doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.19274.

17. National Research Council. Chapter 2: Animal care and Use
Program in Guide For the care and Use of laboratory Animals.
Eight Edition. Washington DC: National Academy of Science;
2011. p. 11-40.

18. Komisi Nasional Etik penelitian Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan
RI. Pedoman nasional etik penggunaan hewan percobaan.
Suplemen II: Etik penggunaan hewan percobaan. Jakarta:Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2006.

19. Fakultas Kedokteran hewan IPB. Unit Pengelola Hewan Laboraturium. Tersedia pada http://fkh.ipb.ac.id/fasilitas/unit-pengelola-hewan-laboratorium-uphl/. Diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2017.

20. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro. FK Undip sediakan laboratorium hewan coba. Tersedia pada http://www.undip.ac.id/?p=3346&lang=id. Diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2017.

21. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada. Profil ruang hewan coba FK UGM. Tersedia pada http://research.fk.ugm.ac.id/index.php/laboratorium/laboratorium-hewan-coba. Diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2017.

22. Marice S, Raflizar. Status gizi dan fungsi hati mencit galur CBS-swiss dan tikus putih galur wistar di laboratorium hewan percobaan puslitbang biomedis dan farmasi. Media Litbang Kesehatan. 2010; 20(1):33-40.
23. European Comission. Animal used for scientific purposes. Tersedia pada http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/home_en.htm. Diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2017.

24. Netherlands National Committe for The Protection of Animal Used for Scientific Purposes. Opinion provided by NCAd as to how the Netherlands can become a pioneer in non-animal research. Tersedia pada https://english.ncadierproevenbeleid.nl/. Diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2017.

25. Centrale Commissie Dierproven. Tersedia pada https://www.centralecommissiedierproeven.nl/. Diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2017.

26. Instantie voor dierenwelzijn Utrecht. EU Guideline on Animal Experiment. Tersedia pada https://www.centralecommissiedierproeven.nl/. Diakses 1 Februari 2017.
Published
2017-04-18
Views & Downloads
Abstract views: 791   
PDF downloads: 2577   
How to Cite
Yurista, S., Ferdian, R., & Sargowo, D. (2017). Principles of the 3Rs and ARRIVE Guidelines in Animal Research. Indonesian Journal of Cardiology, 37(3), 156-63. https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.v37i3.579
Section
Review Article