Comparison of right ventricular global longitudinal strain between pacemaker lead position in patients with permanent pacemaker

  • Muhamad Fakhri Resident of the Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, M Djamil Hospital, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia.
  • Hauda El Rasyid Staff of the Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, M Djamil Hospital, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia.
  • Mefri Yanni Staff of the Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, M Djamil Hospital, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia.
  • Rizanda Machmud Community Medicine and Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia.
Keywords: Pacemaker lead, Right ventricular function, Right ventricular global longitudinal strain

Abstract

In “Comparison of right ventricular global longitudinal strain between pacemaker lead position in patients with permanent pacemaker” (Indonesian Journal of Cardiology, 46(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1592), there is an error noted. An error has been found in the PDF version of this article.

The DOI printed in the PDF is incorrect. The correct DOI is https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1592. The error occurs only in the PDF; the DOI listed in the article metadata is already correct.

The publisher apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this error.

DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1592

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fakhri M, El Rasyd H, Yanni M, Machmud R. Comparison of right ventricular global longitudinal strain between pacemaker lead position in patients with permanent pacemaker. Indones J Cardiol. 2025;46(2):64-70. doi:10.30701/ijc.1592
Published
2026-04-30
Views & Downloads
Abstract views: 18   
PDF downloads: 16   
How to Cite
Fakhri, M., Rasyid, H., Yanni, M., & Machmud, R. (2026). Comparison of right ventricular global longitudinal strain between pacemaker lead position in patients with permanent pacemaker. Indonesian Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.2233
Section
Erratum