Quality of Life Evaluation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patient who Underwent Phase III Rehabilitation Program

  • Kiki Abdurachim Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty University of Indonesia National Cardiovascular Center, Harapan Kita, Jakarta
  • Harmani Kalim Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty University of Indonesia National Cardiovascular Center, Harapan Kita, Jakarta
  • Basuni Radi Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty University of Indonesia National Cardiovascular Center, Harapan Kita, Jakarta

Abstract

Background. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is one of the management for coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular rehabilitation usually conducted for recovery and improved quality of life. Questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life. One of the quality of life instrument most commonly used is Questionnaire SF-36. So far there isn’t any study to evaluate quality of life in patients post CABG who wish to follow rehabilitation program phase III in Indonesia.
Methods and results.This is a cross sectional study conducted in the National Cardiovascular Centre (NCC) - Rehabilitation Division to patients post CABG in phase III rehabilitation program during 2004-2005. Subject was taken in consecutive sampling manner. Questionnaire SF-36 was handed directly or via mail. Validity and reliability test was done for the questionnaire form in Indonesia language. There were 112 patients, 34 patients did rehabilitation program in hospital and 78 were home-based.
The characteristics between two groups were similar. Validity test using r product moment from Pearson to every questions in SF-36 showed r = 0,53-0.83 > 0,51 (r table) and Cronbach a= 0,855. SF-36 scoring was not significantly different among the two groups (in hospital rehab vs home-based rehab) and also control group (healthy).
Conclusions. There were no difference in quality of life and aerobic ca-pacity in patients who performed rehabilitation program phase III in hospi-tal and home-based.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

John Sampalis, Stella Boukas, Moishe Liberman, Tracey Reid, gilles Dupuis, Impact of waiting time on the quality of life of patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. CAMJ.2001; 165(4): 429-433.

Yap AG et all, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery on Small Patients, J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12 (5):242-246.

Ades PA, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Of Coronary Heart Disease N Eng J Med 2001; (12): 345

Foster C, Cadwell K, Crenshaw B, Beverly MD, Hatcher S, Kartsdotir AE, Exercise In Secondary Prevention And Cardiac Rehabilitation; Physical Activity and Exercise Training Prescription for Patient Cardiol Clin 2001; 19 (3): 447-457.

Rossenwinkle ET, Bloomfield DM, Arwady MA, Goldsmith RL, Exercise In Secondary Prevention Cardiac Rehabilitation, Exercise and Autonomic Function In Health And Cardiovascular Disease. Cardiol Clin 2001; 19 (3).

Agarwal A, Ades PA, Exercise In Secondary Prevention And Cardiac Rehabilitation, Exercise Rehabilitation Of Older Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.

Balady GJ et al, Core Components Of Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Program: A statement for Healthcare Proffesional from the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Circulation, 2000; 02: 1069-1074.

Testa MA, Simondson DC. Assesment of Quality of life Outcomes. N Eng J Med 1996; 272:619-26.

Gotay CC, Korn EL, Mc Cabe MS, Moore TD, Cheson BD. Quality of life Assesment in Cancer Treatment protocols; research Issues I Protocol Development J National Cancer Ins. 1992;84: 579-9.

Leplege A, Hunt S. The Problem Of Quality Of Life In Medicine. JAMA.1997; 278:47-50.

Covinsky KE, Wu AW, Landefeld S, Connors AF, Philips RS, Tsevat J, Dawson NV, et al. Health Status Versus Quality Of Life In Older Patients: Does The Distinction Matter? Am J Med.1999; 106:435-40.

Guyatt GH, Fenny DH, Patrick DL, Measuring Health-Related Quality Of Life. Ann Intern Med.1003; 118:622-9.

John E. Ware, Jr, PhD, SF-36 Health Survey Update, SPINE 2000; 25 (24): 3130-39.

Brazier J, Jines N, Kind P. Testing The Validity OfThe Eoroqol and Comparing It With The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire. Qual life Res.1993; 2:169-80.

Djalali H, Pudji Mulyono, Ramly. Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan, Program Pasca Sarjana UNJ, 2000:70-86.

Husaini Usman, Purnomo Setiady A, Statistik untuk Menguji Validitas dan Reabilitas Instrumen In: Pengantar Statistik ed.2; 2006: 287-295.

Bland JM, Atman DG. Statistic Notes: Validating scales and indexes. Br Med J.2002; 324:606-7.

Astoro NW. Kualitas Hidup Penderita HIV dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh (Tesis). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2004.

Wijaya A. Kualitas Hidup Pasien Penyakit Gagal Ginjal Kronik yang Menjalani Hemodialisa dan Mengalami Depresi (Tesis) Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2005.

Febrila AH. Uji Keandakan dan Kesahihan Formulir European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) untuk mengukur Kualitas Hidup Terkait Kesehatan pada Usia Lanjut di RSUPNCM (Tesis); Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia 2006

Marchionni N, Francesco F, Stefano F, Neil O et al. Improved Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life With Cardiac Rehabilitation of Older Patients After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation.2003; 107:2201-2206.

Nancy H Miller, Haskell WL, Berra K, Debusk RF. Home Versus Group Exercise Training For Increasing Functional Capacity After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation.1984; 40:645–649.

CDC. Health related quality of life surveillance United States, 1993-2002 MMWR.2005; 54 (SSO4):1-35.

Hemingway H, Stafford M, Stansfield S, Shipley M, Marmot M. Is The SF-36 A Valid Measure Of Change In Population Health? Result From The Whitehall II Study. Br Med J.1997; 315:1273-9.

Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE. Using The SF-36 With Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Community-Based Survey. Age & Aging.2001; 30:337-43.

Lucas R, Monteserin R, Junca S. Quality Of Life And Sociodemographic Characteristics Of Older Adults (the WHOQOL OLD project). [cited 2006 Feb 1]. Available from: http://envillement.org documents/doc0001.pdf.
Views & Downloads
Abstract views: 322   
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 188   
How to Cite
Abdurachim, K., Kalim, H., & Radi, B. (1). Quality of Life Evaluation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patient who Underwent Phase III Rehabilitation Program. Indonesian Journal of Cardiology, 28(3), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.v28i3.240
Section
Clinical Research