The Need for National Registry
Abstract
Currently medical outcomes research has generally been conducted with 3 sources of data: randomized clinical trials, administrative claims databases, and data registries. Each of these data sources has a unique set of applications, data quality issues, and requirements.1 In United State, clinical trials is part of the pharmaceutical and device pre-approval process thus it has highly regulated requirements for source document verification.2 In contrast, quality control of administrative data is primarily limited to fields directly related to claims adjudication. Thus, administrative claims data are significantly limited for the purposes of performing healthcare research.3 Like administrative claims data, registries are nonrandomized, observational datasets that can be generalized to real-world practice, depending on the representativeness of participants and the completeness of enrollment.4 However, as with the data collected in randomized clinical trials, registries include detailed clinical data using standardized data definitions.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Messenger JC, Ho KK , Young CH, Slattery LE, Draoui JC, Curtis JP, Dehmer GJ, Grover FL, Mirro MJ, Reynolds MR, Rokos IC, Spertus JA, Wang TY, Winston SA, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi FA. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(16):1484-1488.
Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(8):844-850.
Shahian DM, Silverstein T, Lovett AF, Wolf RE, Normand SL. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1518-1527.
Gliklich R, Campion FX. Patient registries. MGMA Connex. 2010;10(1):15-17.
Cardiology ESo. EURObservational Research Programme. The new programme of surveys and registries Available at: http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/eorp/Pages/welcome.aspx. Accessed 12 January, 2014.
Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(8):844-850.
Shahian DM, Silverstein T, Lovett AF, Wolf RE, Normand SL. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1518-1527.
Gliklich R, Campion FX. Patient registries. MGMA Connex. 2010;10(1):15-17.
Cardiology ESo. EURObservational Research Programme. The new programme of surveys and registries Available at: http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/eorp/Pages/welcome.aspx. Accessed 12 January, 2014.
Published
2015-03-31
Views & Downloads
Abstract views: 4084
PDF downloads: 1615
PDF downloads: 1615
How to Cite
Yuniadi, Y. (2015). The Need for National Registry. Indonesian Journal of Cardiology, 35(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.v35i1.368
Section
Editorial
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
